<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Architecture Now – Matthew Charles</title><link>https://architecturenow.co.nz/members/Charles-Matthew/rss.xml</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://architecturenow.co.nz/members/Charles-Matthew/rss.xml" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en-AU</language><copyright>2026 AGM A Division of BCI Central. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 21:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Opinion: Why Design-Build is winning in New Zealand</title><link>https://architecturenow.co.nz/articles/opinion-why-design-build-is-winning-in-new-zealand/</link><description>




&lt;img alt="Opinion: Why Design-Build is winning in New Zealand" src="https://cdn.architecturenow.co.nz/site_media/media/cache/9f/90/9f906588a3d683accf2bde14a7a336a2.jpg" width="640" height="427" /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Matthew Charles:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;The traditional model — where architects complete designs, then hand them to builders for pricing — has served New Zealand construction for decades. But when material costs swing wildly, labour shortages persist, and projects stall under variations and delays, that linear handoff looks less like a process and more like a problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Design-Build changes the conversation. Instead of architects and builders working in sequence, they work in partnership from day one. The client contracts with a single entity responsible for both design and construction, collapsing timelines and shifting risk to those best positioned to manage it. This procurement method has moved from alternative to essential over my 30-year career, particularly as New Zealand developers recognise its value in uncertain times.&lt;/p&gt;
</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matthew Charles</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>17908</guid></item></channel></rss>